- Home
- Blog
- Ruby & Rails Core
- Rails 8.2 Callbacks and Background Jobs in Production
Rails 8.2 Callbacks and Background Jobs in Production
How Ruby 4.0 Turns Hidden Coupling into Outages
Callbacks feel harmless — until production traffic proves otherwise.
Rails 8.2 tightens execution order. Ruby 4.0 removes timing slack. Together, they turn poorly-placed callbacks into latency spikes and job backlogs.
Let’s talk about where callbacks break, and what to do instead.
Callbacks Hide Control Flow
This looks innocent:
after_commit :sync_crm
In Rails 8.2, this runs more predictably — and more frequently — than before.
The problem isn’t correctness. It’s invisibility.
If you can’t see when code runs, you can’t reason about performance.
Ruby 4.0 Exposes Timing Assumptions
Ruby 4.0 schedules work more honestly. That means callbacks that used to “feel async” now block visibly.
Background jobs pile up. Requests wait longer. Nothing crashes — it just slows.
Replace Callbacks with Explicit Boundaries
Instead of this:
after_commit :enqueue_job
Do this:
User.transaction do
user.save!
end
UserSyncJob.perform_async(user.id)
Explicit beats clever every time.
Final Thoughts
Rails 8.2 didn’t break your callbacks. Ruby 4.0 didn’t either.
They just stopped hiding the cost. Having trouble with rails? Check out Ruby 3.5 Preview: What Matters for Rails in Production.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve our content
How We Verify Conversions
Every conversion shown on this site follows a strict verification process to ensure correctness:
- Compare results on same dataset — We run both SQL and ActiveRecord against identical test data and verify results match
-
Check generated SQL with
to_sql— We inspect the actual SQL Rails generates to catch semantic differences (INNER vs LEFT JOIN, WHERE vs ON, etc.) - Add regression tests for tricky cases — Edge cases like NOT EXISTS, anti-joins, and predicate placement are tested with multiple scenarios
- Tested on Rails 8.1.1 — All conversions verified on current Rails version to ensure compatibility
Last updated: February 22, 2026
Try These Queries in Our Converter
See the SQL examples from this article converted to ActiveRecord—and compare the SQL Rails actually generates.
Deep Dive into ActiveRecord
Raza Hussain
Full-stack developer specializing in Ruby on Rails, React, and modern JavaScript. 15+ years upgrading and maintaining production Rails apps. Led Rails 4/5 → 7 upgrades with 40% performance gains, migrated apps from Heroku to Render cutting costs by 35%, and built systems for StatusGator, CryptoZombies, and others. Available for Rails upgrades, performance work, and cloud migrations.
More on SQL to ActiveRecord
Junior Dev Asked "Why Not Just Use SQL?" Gave Textbook Answer. They Weren't Convinced. Then Production Happened.
Not ideology—operations. See how ActiveRecord cut P95 from 1.2s→220ms, dropped queries 501→7, and avoided schema-change bugs. When to use SQL safely, too.
SQL Certification on Resume. Rails Interview Failed. Knew Databases. Didn't Know ActiveRecord.
SQL cert on your resume but Rails interview still flopped? Learn the ActiveRecord skills interviews test—associations, eager loading, batching, and when to use raw SQL.
Read "Agile Web Development with Rails." Still Couldn't Write Queries. Needed Examples, Not Theory.
Books teach concepts. You need examples. See SQL vs ActiveRecord side-by-side, when to use scopes/Arel/SQL, and how to ship maintainable queries fast.
Leave a Response
Responses (0)
No responses yet
Be the first to share your thoughts